On Dates from Ancient Greek History

Many reliable scholarly resource offer a variety of conflicting date ranges. It’s important to note the variation and corresponding accounts for the given dates. However, it is not important for students to associate a fixed range with the Stone Age unless context makes it necessary. For example, it might be important if the reason forContinue reading “On Dates from Ancient Greek History”

From A Note on Metaphilosophy by Morris Lazerowitz, 1970

“The word has a brief history. It was coined by me in 1940 so as to enable me to refer unambiguously to a special kind of investigation which Wittgenstein had described as one of the “heirs” of philosophy. The term ‘metaphilosophical’ first appeared in print in July 1942 in a review of C.J. Ducasse’s bookContinue reading “From A Note on Metaphilosophy by Morris Lazerowitz, 1970”

Skepticism Journal: More Historical Background on Sextus and Hellenistic Skepticism

What was his background? It makes sense to think of a few perspectives: author, philosopher, and medical practitioner chief among them. The name Sextus Empiricus and a few comments from one of his texts suggests that he served a doctor within the empiric tradition. There’s evidence Sextus wrote medical works in addition to philosophy butContinue reading “Skepticism Journal: More Historical Background on Sextus and Hellenistic Skepticism”

Skepticism Journal: On The Introduction to PO by Jonathan Barnes

A Summary Historical Background of Hellenistic Skepticism, Outlines, and Sextus — According to Barnes the Latin edition published in 1562 by Henri Estienne corresponds to a shift in western philosophy from grounding stances in metaphysical foundations towards the epistemological. Estienne, also known as Henricus Stephanus is also the source of so-called Stephanus pagination which is stillContinue reading “Skepticism Journal: On The Introduction to PO by Jonathan Barnes”

Skepticism Journal: Early Notes on Outlines of Scepticism, Annas & Barnes Translation

General Contextual Notes — English editions worthy of consideration include translations by R.G. Bury (Loeb), Benson Mates (Oxford), and Richard Bett (Princeton). The Mates rendering makes use of contemporary academic philosophy language more than I’m comfortable with because of the increased likelihood of misinterpretation resulting from anachronism. Also, Richard Bett’s translation of Outlines published in 2021Continue reading “Skepticism Journal: Early Notes on Outlines of Scepticism, Annas & Barnes Translation”

A rough summary of four widely applied senses of skepticism today

Ordinary – generally according to a dictionary definition. Vaguely signifies a doubting attitude or state of incredulity. Scientific – sometimes characterized instrumentally. Typically applied to particular domains of thought or in accordance with empirical investigation. Philosophical – tends to focus on the aporetic and suspensive aspects of skepticism. Arguably rooted in doxastic or epistemic topicsContinue reading “A rough summary of four widely applied senses of skepticism today”

A Summary of Distinctions between Ancient and Contemporary Skepticism

With the following remarks I’m primarily referring to commentary by folks like Richard Bett, Katja Vogt, and Julia Annas who’re following ancient sources like Sextus, Cicero, and Diogenes. Assuming skepticism is appropriately regarded as part of philosophy or a kind of philosophical activity: contemporary skepticism tends to have more of an epistemic (knowledge-based) focus whereasContinue reading “A Summary of Distinctions between Ancient and Contemporary Skepticism”

Monster the Magnificent!

Oh look! It’s my fluffy tabby friend. 🐱 As is indicated by the title, his name is Monster. He’s just over fifteen years old now but he’s still as playful and cuddly as ever. ❤ I’m sure I’ll find reasons to post more sets of Monster related content. He’s reasonably photogenic and one of myContinue reading “Monster the Magnificent!”

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started