In Defense of Skepticism

From a recent exchange with a friend: erist —Here’s an odd rant: criticisms for skepticism that supposes it’s self-defeating seem to depend on a categorical assumption about skepticism being within the domain of philosophical activity while simultaneously challenging the basis for and nature of philosophy. I’m bringing it up because I think I’ve figured out

Being a Skeptic

From what I can tell, it is appropriate to identify me as a pyrrhonist. It’s a complicated concept but an important element of being a pyrrhonist appears to be a matter of lacking any particular philosophy of one’s own to convey. This begs an important question: what is the significance of having a philosophy of